100% Free Consultation (888) 493-1629

Maritime Injury FAQ

What Is a Jones Act Vessel?

The answer to this question changed in 2005. At that time, the U.S. Supreme Court expanded the definition of a vessel to include every description of watercraft or artificial structure capable of being used for transportation on water. As such, the term vessel is no longer restricted to conventional watercraft such as ships, barges, tugs, and special purpose vessels such as jack-up and semi-submersible drilling rigs and other mobile offshore drilling units. The term vessel has been expanded to include unpowered floating structures such as dredges and pontoon rafts.

Many people have questions about the Jones Act status of oil rigs, dredges, and MODU, to name a few. If there is question as to whether or not a vessel classifies as a Jones Act vessel, it would be best to consult a seasoned maritime attorney.

Jones Act vessels must be registered in the U.S. Our laws require that crewmembers be American citizens or legal aliens. Cabotage laws, what the Jones Act falls under, requires also that the ships must be built and owned by the United States in order to qualify as a Jones Act vessel. They must all be registered under the American flag.

US Code, Title 1, Chapter 1 states that a vessel is "every description of watercraft or other artificial contrivance used or capable of being used as a means of transportation on water."

The Case That Defined Jones Act Vessels: Stewart v. Dutra

The 2005 Supreme Court decision that clarified the definition of a Jones Act vessel occurred in Stewart v. Dutra Construction Co. (03-814) 543 U.S. 481. During the case, a worker (Stewart) injured while working on a large dredge owned by Dutra Construction Company tried to use the Jones Act to receive compensation for his injuries. At trial, a court concluded that the dredge did not qualify for the Jones Act because its main purpose was dredging rather than transportation.

When Stewart v. Dutra made it to the Supreme Court, the highest court in the United States sided with the worker. It decided that a Jones Act vessel isn’t one that is focused on transportation. Instead, vessels are those that are capable of transportation.

According to this definition, since the dredge needed to move to fulfill its purpose, it was a Jones Act vessel. In other words, those who hid behind a strict definition of a Jones Act vessel were no longer able to escape accountability because of this important Supreme Court decision.

To learn more about this law and how it applies to you, call our Jones Act attorneys at (888) 493-1629. We can help.

Case Results

Check Out Our Victories

  • $8 Billion Top 3 Largest Jury Verdict in U.S. History Arnold & Itkin LLP tried a Risperdal case against Johnson & Johnson for failing to warn about one of the drug’s most damaging side effects: gynecomastia. Our skill, hard work, and dedication resulted in the third-largest jury verdict ever obtained ...
  • $357 Million Largest Workplace Accident Settlement in Texas history Arnold & Itkin LLP secured a massive nine-figure settlement against a transnational corporation for a workplace incident. The settlement set a Texas record for being the largest personal injury settlement in the state’s history.
  • $222 Million Record-Breaking Verdict for Widow Our firm won $222 million for a woman who lost her husband in an industrial accident caused by a faulty valve. We took the case to trial because the at-fault company refused to take responsibility. The jury saw through the corporate lies and double ...
  • $205 Million Confidential Settlement Obtained for Numerous Clients Arnold & Itkin reached a record $205,000,000 settlement on behalf of clients after several years of hard-fought litigation. The case settled just before trial was set to begin.
  • $171 Million One of the Largest Confidential Settlements in History Arnold & Itkin worked over the course of several years to represent clients in a case that many other law firms turned down. In the end, we were able to obtain a record-setting confidential settlement of $171 million.
  • $117 Million Largest Single-Event Personal Injury Verdict in Louisiana History Arnold & Itkin represented a pregnant woman who experienced stomach pain and called Acadian Ambulance. The driver of the ambulance drove the ambulance into the back of a sugar cane truck causing the plaintiff's spine to be severed at T4 and for her ...
  • $116 Million Confidential Settlement Arnold & Itkin LLP negotiated a massive nine figure settlement on behalf of their clients after several years of hard fought litigation.
  • $110 Million Record Settlement Achieved for Victims of Defective Products Arnold & Itkin obtained a record settlement for individuals harmed by defective, dangerous products. The result exemplifies our commitment to clients and justice for those seriously injured by the conduct of others.
  • $105 Million Record Settlement for Dangerous Product Victims Arnold & Itkin’s legal team helped represent those harmed by dangerous products. We were successful in recovering a $105 million settlement.
  • $97 Million Massive Settlement Secured for Refinery Workers Arnold & Itkin is proud to share that after months of preparation for trial, our firm was able to secure a huge settlement for clients who were injured in a refinery fire. Find out more now.
See All Results
“They were just so understanding and they got it. They got that we lost our child, they got that no one else probably loved our child like we loved our child, and they understood that. They said ‘We’re going to look at this and do everything we can to try to get your family some kind of justice.’”
Larry Client

Secure Your Future & Request a 100% Free Consultation

  • Please enter your first name.
  • Please enter your last name.
  • This isn't a valid email address.
    Please enter your email address.
  • This isn't a valid phone number.
    Please enter your phone number.
  • Please make a selection.
  • Please enter a message.