100% Free Consultation (888) 493-1629

Defective Children's Products

Are the Products You Use Safe for Your Kids?

Defective Child & Infant Products

Top-Rated Product Liability Attorneys for Dangerous Children's Products

When parents buy children's products, including bassinets, car seats, cribs and strollers, they expect the products to have passed stringent safety tests, ensuring the safety of their child. Unfortunately, manufacturers often scrimp on testing, which results in products that conceal serious defects. At Arnold & Itkin, we're dedicated to helping people who've suffered because of manufacturing or design defects in the products they use. Assisting injured children is an area of particular importance to us. The products created particularly for children should be designed and manufactured with special care. They should include proper instructions and sufficient warning labels. When this does not occur and a child is seriously injured, we are standing by to seek justice.

Toxic Ingestion Hazards

Some of the biggest toy recalls in U.S. history have had to do with toys that concealed toxic ingestion hazards, most notably, the ingestion of lead. As one toy giant after another recalled large volumes of toys, doctors advised worried parents to get their children's blood lead levels checked. Most of the toxic toys were manufactured outside the U.S., where standards of lead paint exposure to children are not as stringently maintained as they are in the U.S. However, it is the responsibility of toy makers to ensure their products do not contain unsafe chemical levels.

Some common toxic ingestion hazards with toys include lead poisoning, explained further down this page and phthalates. Phthalates is a group of hazardous chemicals known to cause genital abnormalities, hormonal imbalances, and other reproductive defects in male children exposed to them for long periods of time. These chemicals are often added to plastics to give them a softer, smoother, and more appealing feel.

Common infant products that include phthalates are the following:

  • Teething rings
  • Baby rattlers
  • Pacifiers
  • Bottle nipples

These can enter the body when the child places toys in his mouth and can interfere with sperm production in male children, leading to decreased levels of testosterone, as well as malformed genitals. The dangers are strong enough that pregnant women are advised to keep away from air fresheners, cosmetics and other products that contain phthalates because exposure can cause reproductive system abnormalities in a male fetus.

Choking Hazards

Choking and aspiration hazards are some of the leading causes of child death in conjunction with children's products. In 2003, choking-related deaths linked to children's toys accounted for 64% of the total number of deaths caused by dangerous toys. That same year, close to 72% of all choking deaths related to toys were linked to choking on small balls; however, children can also choke on things like un-inflated balloons, pieces of burst balloons, and magnets in toys. Even the harmless looking stuffed toy your child plays with can conceal dangers in the form of buttons and beads that make up its eyes and nose. These parts can come off, posing a choking risk.

Almost all major toy manufacturers have been forced to recall thousands of toys after they were found to present choking hazards.

While a child's tendency to put things in his or her mouth can't be curbed, manufacturers can take steps to make sure that risks are kept to an absolute minimum. For instance, teethers, and baby rattles should be large enough that they cannot fit in a child's throat. Also, toy cars and buses must not have wheels that can come off.

Child Safety Protection Act: Helping Combat the Risks of Choking

To combat the rise of choking-related death, the CPSC passed the Child Safety Protection Act that bans products with small parts for children under the age of three. This is why many products we see in the stores have a label that says something like "not intended for children under 3." Small part regulations are detailed in the Code of Federal Regulations Title 16, Parts 1501 and 1500.50, 51 and 52.

Small children are especially prone to putting things in their mouths, which is why choking deaths and injuries are so common. Toy manufacturers must test their products in order to determine if they qualify as a choking hazard. If they do, then the manufacturer must properly place this warning on the product's label and packaging. A failure to do so will constitute a marketing defect which can impose fines and even result in the total recall of the product.

How does the CPSC determine which products are dangerous for small children? They use the "choke test cylinder."

Even if a product does not fit through the cylinder, but has parts that can break off and fit inside the cylinder, it will be considered a choking hazard for children under the age of three. Products that have small, round object especially pose a threat to young children. Balls that are less than 1.75 inches are considered a choking hazard. Anyone can purchase a choke testing tube in order to test their children's toys. It is important to note that, on some occasions, some products that can pass through the choking tube may still present a choking hazard to young children. It is important to note that not all products must pass this test and put warnings on their labels.

Products that can present a choking hazard but are not subject to these small part regulations:

  • Balloons
  • Books and other paper articles
  • Crayons, chalk, pencils, and pens
  • Paint, watercolors, and clay
  • Clothing and accessories

These products are exempt because they need to be small in order to perform their intended function. Rattles and baby pacifiers are also subject to their own regulations listed under a different section of federal regulations.

Strangulation Hazards

Every year, hundreds of children's products are recalled due to strangulation, choking, and suffocation. Strangulation hazards caused by children's products account for nearly 22% of all accidental fatalities in children.

There are two types of strangulation:

  • Ligature strangulation refers to strangulation by a cord or rope. For instance, a child playing with window blind cords can wrap the cords around their neck, interrupting oxygen supply. Breathing difficulties result almost immediately. Asphyxiation can result if there is no adult nearby to give emergency aid. Ligature strangulation is often seen in children of curious ages, specifically 1 to 2. 30% of all strangulation deaths recorded are the result of ligature strangulation.
  • Suspension strangulation occurs when the body is suspended above the ground by the neck. Such strangulation often occurs with playground equipment, cribs, and other furniture. Cribs with low sides are a common cause of such accidents. Suspension strangulation is the most frequent of all child strangulation accidents, accounting for nearly 70% of all related fatalities.

Defective & Dangerous Toys

Toy manufacturers, like other companies, are required to produce toys that are, most importantly, safe for children. Unfortunately, parents often find themselves rushing to the E.R. because their child swallowed a small detachable part, has been burnt, or has been strangled. In 2008, thousands of parents rushed their children to labs for lead detection tests to find out if their child had ingested dangerously high levels of lead from toxic paint on their toys. In 2003, more than 155,000 children, most of them below the age of 4, required emergency room treatment due to dangerous toy related injuries. That same year, there were 11 dangerous toy related deaths. Our firm represents clients throughout the United States who have been injured by defective and dangerous children's toys.

We are committed to helping families recover the money that will cover an injured child's medical bills, continued treatment, and possibly much more. You can find out more about our services by calling (888) 493-1629 today.

Buckyballs & BuckyCubes: Injuries from Ingested Magnets

Buckyballs and BuckyCubes are made up of multiple individual magnets that are packaged together in clumps of 10, 125, and 216. Maxfield & Oberton Holdings LLC originally manufactured these products to children, calling it an "amazing magnetic toy." Later, the product changed its marketing to target adults as a desk toy. More than two million of these products have been sold to consumers around the U.S.

Unfortunately, children and teenagers were ingesting the product, causing injuries to the digestive tract. Many individuals even needed surgery to remediate the damage. A bulk of the complaints came after children (typically under the age of 14) ingested two or more of these magnets. The magnetic force would pull the magnets together after they were already in the digestive tract and pinch the intestinal wall and tissue together.

In some, this caused tissue injury, inflammation, ulcers, infections, and even death. If children do not tell their parents of swallowing the magnets, then parents and doctors alike would misdiagnose the condition as symptoms were highly similar to stomach flu or another type of gastrointestinal upset. Initial symptoms include nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain. Because the situation was not seen as life-threatening in many cases, necessary surgery was delayed. This caused some to suffer permanent and life-threatening internal injuries.

The Consumer Product Safety Commission filed a complaint against Maxfield & Oberton Holdings LLC for the manufacturing of Buckyballs and BuckyCube. The CPSC alleged the company manufactured a product with design, packaging, and marketing defects. They also claimed there was a lack of proper warnings on the labels for these products. The requirement for a product of this type is to warn "for children 14+" while the company warned "for children 13+"; however, even when the company changed their packaging, the injuries continued to occur.

The CPSC claimed that warnings for the products were ineffective because once the products were taken out of their cases, children no longer care about safety risks. Most retailers are now clearing these harmful magnetic products off of their shelves. The complaint filed against Maxfield & Oberton was an administrative complaint, which is extremely rare. In fact, only one other administrative complaint has been filed within the past 11 years.

Pocket Bikes

Pocket bikes were marketed to children, teenagers, and adults throughout the country. These mini-motorcycles look exactly like full-scale motorbikes, but are only 2 feet tall and 40 pounds in weight. However, the danger comes from the fact that they are fast. With 40cc engines, they can race up to 50mph.

Due to the hazards that these dangerous "toys" have created, they are now restricted in some states.

For example, while they may be allowed on private property, they are not allowed on public streets or sidewalks. This is also due to the fact that they do not come equipped with required road safety equipment and they are not registered at the DMV. Other states have age restrictions for who can legally operate these bikes. Thousands of reports of injuries and deaths have been flooding in. Due to their small size, it has been shown that other drivers have had difficulty in seeing them. When struck by a motor vehicle, pocket bike riders have little or no protection against injury. In other cases, bike riders have collided with pedestrians, causing serious injuries.

Defective Car Seats

Studies show that every year, there are an estimated 130,000 children who are treated for injuries sustained from car seat injuries. These Emergency Room visits often follow a car accident. In most cases, the associated injuries may have been lessened or prevented had the parents been appropriately educated on car seat safety. When surveyed, nearly 1 in 3 doctors in various ERs report that their emergency departments don't have any resources for educating parents on this measure for child safety. This research suggests the fact that ERs are allowed to educate the public on car seat safety tactics, and yet they are not being educated themselves on these methods.

If you drive with a child or infant in your car, you realize that you are carrying precious cargo. You want to do everything you can to ensure your child's safety when driving. You likely put your child in a car seat to protect them in the event of an accident, but sometimes that may not be enough. Unfortunately, it is estimated that about 10 million car seats were found to be defective and recalled after reports of safety malfunctions which caused an infant or child harm. Many of those recalls were from major brand names and manufacturers of car seats.

The defects that typically occur in car seats include:

  • Bad handles
  • Weak construction
  • Sudden buckle releases

Because car accidents are the #1 cause of unintended death for children under the age of 14, it is important to be well-informed about child car seats and their possible safety risks. If you notice any cracks in the buckles or any part of your child's car seat, it should not be considered safe. Some models of car seats that have been recalled include Baby Trend, Basic Comfort, Britax, Dorel, and Graco. This is not a comprehensive list, so if you are concerned that your child's car seat may not be safe, look up the manufacturing name.

Defective Restraints for Older Children

Babies have special restraints designed for their safety as adults do, but children who are too big for infant restraints and too small for adult restraints are missing out. Built-in child safety seats would make it safer for older children to ride in vehicles, but currently, no effort is being put forth to make this a safety standard. Typically, a product such as this would target children who are between the ages of four and eight, weighing at least 50 pounds. Many accidents lead to child injury because the seatbelts they were using were not conducive to safety.

Commonly used are "booster seats," which is currently the standard for older child car safety. However, in a recent study, only 20-38% of children in the vulnerable age (4-8) use them.

This is probably because there is no clear message about the standards for older child car safety and the NHTSA campaigns tend to shy away from the topic. The agency actually doesn't even require booster seat testing for older children and even more shocking than this, they do not require vehicle manufacturers to build vehicles that can accommodate older child safety restraints. While many measures are currently being taken to improve overall passenger safety in vehicles, the number of injuries to young children has actually increased in recent years.

Because it is not required, U.S. auto makers do not manufacture their vehicles with older child safety in mind. They also do not typically test their vehicles for safety or advise car owners on the potential risks. It seems now that it is up to individual automobile manufacturers to develop better safety mechanisms to outfit their cars with so that they are safe for children. If your child was injured in a car accident and you believe that their injuries could have been lessened or prevented by adequate child restraints, then you should definitely seek legal help. A skilled product liability attorney can help you with your case and advocate on your behalf should you become a client.

Defective Bicycle Helmets

One product type the CPSC has issued public requirements for is bicycle helmets. If a helmet is proven not to meet the Children's Bicycle Helmet Safety Act standards, it will be recalled, even if there have been no reported injuries. All bicycle helmet manufacturers must perform tests, record the results of those tests, and place inserts or stickers on all of helmets stating the product has been tested and approved by CPSC standards.

One common way in which a helmet can fail to meet consumer safety standards is a faulty chin strap.

Most chin straps are held on by a plastic buckle. If this buckle is faulty or easily breakable, then in the event of a fall, the helmet would come off and not protect the wearer. Helmets may also be made of faulty materials. If the plastic or other material is too thin or fragile, then the helmet would not comply with CPSC standards because it would not fully protect the wearer from head injury in the event of a fall. Materials used in the manufacturing of bicycle helmets must be able to absorb the shock of a fall, and when they do not, they pose a safety hazard.

Defective Cribs

Over 11 million cribs, bassinets, and playpens have been recalled since 2007. Before purchasing a crib for your child, check to make sure it has not been recalled. The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission has a detailed list of recalled cribs. Besides checking to ensure your child's crib has not been recalled, parents are also urged to ensure the crib is structurally sound. There should not be any gaps larger than two fingers on the sides of crib and mattress. Failure to assemble the crib according to the instructions can also lead to injury and as can using an old or modified crib. Curtain cords and blinds also pose a strangulation threat, so do not place a crib next to a window.

Defective Children's Products: FAQ

What types of defects occur in children’s toys?

Children’s toys may have various defects in the way they’re designed, produced, packaged, or marketed. Toys need to be appropriate for the age to which they’re marketed. The packaging must be clear, helping parents determine whether their children can safely play with a certain toy. The materials used to make the toy must be child-friendly and free from defects, and the design itself must be reasonably safe for children in the appropriate age group.

The following are examples of potentially dangerous toys: toys that can break into small parts, presenting choking hazards for young children; magnets and toys with magnets inside that can cause internal organ damage if swallowed; toys manufactured with lead paint that children may ingest; toys that pose risks of serious eye injury, such as dart guns; and motorized vehicles for children that travel too swiftly or lack proper occupant protection. Any of these defects could cause a child to suffer serious harm. If this happened to your child, be sure to involve an attorney who can help you hold the manufacturer or other responsible party accountable.

How could a design defect make an infant product dangerous?

When it comes to infant products, parents rely on product manufacturers to use clear labeling, safety warnings, and instructions for use. Even if all these things are correct, however, a design defect could make it dangerous. The Bumbo seat is an example of a product that was recalled twice. These molded seats were designed for infants aged 3 to 12 months who cannot sit up unassisted. Unfortunately, some children suffered serious injuries when these seats fell from tables or other high surfaces. This resulted in a 2007 recall and issuance of a warning about placing Bumbo seats on high surfaces. The second recall specifically addressed the design of the infant seat. In August of 2014, the manufacturer issued another recall to add a safety strap that would prevent infants from wiggling from the seat. The Bumbo seat was initially designed without any strap. This flaw in the design of the product led to its subsequent recall. Today, Bumbo seats are sold with the strap and additional warnings.

How do I know if I have a product liability case for a children’s product?

While it’s true that accidents happen and children may get hurt even when products are properly designed and manufactured, there are incidents caused specifically by defective children’s products. If your infant or child was injured while using any type of product—from a car seat to a rattle—make sure you talk to an attorney about your options. There could be many other children who suffered similar injuries. The manufacturer or other at-fault party should be held responsible, not only to give you the chance to seek justice for your child, but to protect others.

Talk to an Experienced Product Liability Lawyer Today: (888) 493-1629

Sometimes, in spite of our best efforts, a defective product will cause them injury. If your child has suffered any injury as the result of a defective child product, make sure you discuss your legal options with a product liability lawyer. We can determine how you can hold the responsible party liable. No matter the particular nature of product liability claim you may have as related to a children's product, you can count on our team to help.

Contact a defective product attorney at Arnold & Itkin today.

Case Results

Check Out Our Victories

  • $8 Billion Top 3 Largest Jury Verdict in U.S. History Arnold & Itkin LLP tried a Risperdal case against Johnson & Johnson for failing to warn about one of the drug’s most damaging side effects: gynecomastia. Our skill, hard work, and dedication resulted in the third-largest jury verdict ever obtained ...
  • $357 Million Largest Workplace Accident Settlement in Texas history Arnold & Itkin LLP secured a massive nine-figure settlement against a transnational corporation for a workplace incident. The settlement set a Texas record for being the largest personal injury settlement in the state’s history.
  • $222 Million Record-Breaking Verdict for Widow Our firm won $222 million for a woman who lost her husband in an industrial accident caused by a faulty valve. We took the case to trial because the at-fault company refused to take responsibility. The jury saw through the corporate lies and double ...
  • $205 Million Confidential Settlement Obtained for Numerous Clients Arnold & Itkin reached a record $205,000,000 settlement on behalf of clients after several years of hard-fought litigation. The case settled just before trial was set to begin.
  • $171 Million One of the Largest Confidential Settlements in History Arnold & Itkin worked over the course of several years to represent clients in a case that many other law firms turned down. In the end, we were able to obtain a record-setting confidential settlement of $171 million.
  • $117 Million Largest Single-Event Personal Injury Verdict in Louisiana History Arnold & Itkin represented a pregnant woman who experienced stomach pain and called Acadian Ambulance. The driver of the ambulance drove the ambulance into the back of a sugar cane truck causing the plaintiff's spine to be severed at T4 and for her ...
  • $116 Million Confidential Settlement Arnold & Itkin LLP negotiated a massive nine figure settlement on behalf of their clients after several years of hard fought litigation.
  • $110 Million Record Settlement Achieved for Victims of Defective Products Arnold & Itkin obtained a record settlement for individuals harmed by defective, dangerous products. The result exemplifies our commitment to clients and justice for those seriously injured by the conduct of others.
  • $105 Million Record Settlement for Dangerous Product Victims Arnold & Itkin’s legal team helped represent those harmed by dangerous products. We were successful in recovering a $105 million settlement.
  • $97 Million Massive Settlement Secured for Refinery Workers Arnold & Itkin is proud to share that after months of preparation for trial, our firm was able to secure a huge settlement for clients who were injured in a refinery fire. Find out more now.
See All Results

Arnold & Itkin is the best for your case if you're injured by a work injury. They’ll fight for you. They’re fighting against, you know, a billion dollar company. They did, I felt, anything and everything they could possibly do to get out of it. They just kept shutting them down.

Shawn Workplace Explosion Victim

Secure Your Future & Request a 100% Free Consultation

  • Please enter your first name.
  • Please enter your last name.
  • This isn't a valid email address.
    Please enter your email address.
  • This isn't a valid phone number.
    Please enter your phone number.
  • Please make a selection.
  • Please enter a message.